|
The Present and The Future Influence Each Other
Can we influence the future with our free will or are we influenced by the future?
Is our futre pre-set? Can we defy a pre-set future with free will?
Can we only create what has always been there, and we only change the density and shape of particles through the attraction of our frequency of vibration?
The future influences the present, say some physicists and awaken the question about how much can we influence the future? Or can it be that the future is set? A theory I don’t want to believe in. I rather want to believe that future and present influence each other. As we can probably influence the future, the changed future influences the present differently as without our influence. That implies a continual change and wouldn’t allow a pre-set destiny, but rather the theory of infinite opportunities.
What is questioned in the article ‘Back From the Future’ is our free will versus pre-set destiny. Could we possibility rewrite our history with actions in the present? Makes me think that if we would be able to change our past, we would then live in a different present and so our future would be different as going from where we are now to where we will be at a specific point in the future.
The lesson for personal improvement is that if we can only change our future if we are making precise plans, and further: we can achieve these plans only if we set them in the present or past. Without plans you are in the power of the future, meaning that you let your future be influenced by higher powers.
Can we defy the future, meaning a pre-set future, with our free will? If we want to change anything about our future, we have to repeat the intentional influence that the future can’t influence us against our wishes, which would prove that we do have a free will.
An influence of the future on the present and the past incorporates a backward causality. If the influence of the future and the present are both-sided, we should be able to influence the past as a result of a change in the present.
Can we predict our future on the information of our past? I would deny this question, which implies that we are influenced by the future.
-Is feedback from the future guiding the development of life, the universe, and, well, everything? –
Something must regulate the particle’s behaviour, says Aharonov, physicist. We cannot perceive the information that controls the particle’s present behaviour, which, from my point of view, is not evidence that it doesn’t exist. Perception is subjective and doesn’t absolutely convey reality, if reality exists at all. I presuppose the existence of information of the existence of particles and also for their behaviour. But from where, from the future or from the past, comes the information that controls the particle’s present behaviour?
To my understanding we don’t create something that has not always been there, we only change the density and shape of a number of particles through the attraction of our frequency of vibration. Two questions come up: Where are the particles from, who or what has created them? And: Are we able to create particles, independent thereof if created consciously or unconsciously?
Back to the future: Do actions that we carry out in the future have repercussions in the here and now? We can definitely assume, so my point of view, that the future is influenced by the present as our actions in the future are influenced by the present and past and probably do influence the present and the past. This means that future and present are influencing each other.
Let us assume you are at home at 9 a.m. and at 10 a. m. in your office. At 9.30 a.m. you cross a specific intersection on the way to your office. To be at 10 in your office you had to cross the intersection 30 minutes earlier or did you cross the intersection, because you decided at 9 a.m. to drive to your office? – Now assume that you decide at 9 a.m. to drive to your office and while you drive you decide to take another street. At 9.30 there is an accident at the intersection. Is that prove for backward causality? Is precognition nothing else than backward causality? I let further thoughts about that incident open…
Summarized: Events in the future probably influence our today’s world. The past, present and future are inseparably entangled.
Children/The New Generation Are Taught The New Thinking And Will Change The World
Children are now taught the New Knowledge at school, which makes their parents be startled.
My nephew, now about 30, does not believe what I write in this blog. He says that this is nonsense and that I am out of my mind. He has a little daughter, whom he loves more than anything else. Whatever Mizzy wants, she gets. She practically has only to think of something and she has it.
Recently Mizzy said to her father, who mentioned that he would like to have the new BMW convertible, that he only has to imagine that this car is in the garage. Jerry told her that this is nonsense, that he has to pay for the car and to pay for it he has to work hard. Mizzy said: “The harder you try, the harder it will get. You work too hard, Daddy.”
As we see each other only once a year, he knew that Mizzy couldn’t have heard about the New Knowledge from me. He had a talk with his wife, asking what they should do that Mizzy would stop thinking that life is easy. He wife said with a shrug: “This is what they learn at school.” He couldn’t believe it. “This is stupid. I don’t want my daughter believe such a nonsense.”
He went to Mizzy’s school and talked to her teacher and told her what Mizzy said and that he doesn’t want her to believe that you can get what you want without working for it. The lady teacher smiled and answered: “You really want that your daughter will work hard at school and maybe not achieve the results you would want her to have? You really want that your daughter will later in life work hard and barely enough money to make a living and only dream from a better life, she can never achieve with hard work?”
Jerry was startled. “But she has to work to make a living!”
“Of course, she will work,” the teacher said. “but it will not feel like work. She will do something she really enjoys doing. And she will make as much money as she needs to live the life she really wants to live.”
“I can’t believe this and I just con’t want that my daughter gets that crap into her system,” Jerry said angrily and walked out and straight to the director of the school.
The director explained to Jerry that this lady teacher is a very good teacher and that they had a trial running in several classes for the past three years teaching the New Thinking. “The results we get are surprisingly good and so we decided to teach the New Knowledge in all classes.,” told Jerry. He told him that the students of the classes, who have been taught the New Knowledge had been significantly better in comparison to the other students.
On the way to his car he saw Mizzy’s teacher walk toward this BMW convertible, which attracted his attention when he arrived.
“Great car!” he said. “Is it your husbands?”
“I am not married,” the lady teacher answered. “It’s my car.”
“How can you afford such a car?” Jerry asked.
“I love teaching and giving information is valuable,” the lady said. “I am selling my knowledge and make tons of money each months. To teach at this school is a hobby. I enjoy to interact with children.”
He came home and told his wife. He is in a state of mind where he can’t understand the world. How can this be that the teacher of his little daughter makes more money than he does as a manager in the corporate world. His daughter believes in such a nonsense and he can’t stop it. He then explained Mizzy that not everyone is making a lot of money just doing what he enjoys to do. Mizzy said: “I will do what I enjoy throughtout my whole life and I will make a lot of money with it.”
When children learn about the New Knowledge, they will have their children grow up with it and this world will change very much in the years to come.
|
